@Mr Abd'l-hakiym; Good, fantastic reasoning: I am glad you have decided to debate unlike the other guy that just came out with some rhetoric about not not following the constitution; I wonder if you think we live in the stone ages .
Now sir if you follow your own logic you can see that "I also do not support corrupt" preachers and so-called men of God. I have criticized them very openly in my previous post.
However, which holds more trouble? A corrupt preacher or a fanatic with a bomb? My reasoning is simply that while we are criticizing Christian leaders; why can't we also get Islamic leaders to openly condem Boko-Haram. I do not support corrupt preachers the exact same way that you do not support Boko-Haram. Now let us get both our religious leaders to "do the right thing."
Also; the Issue of Sharia law in Nigeria is very clear; Let us in the same manner of objectivity examine the issue:
We have a constitution signed by our founding fathers from all parts of the country; in that constitution - EVERYONE has the right religious freedom. A few decades later, a region says no; we do not want to follow this laws anymore - Is that not a variation of what caused the Nigeria-Biafra war in the first place? The Igbos decided they wanted something different and the country went to war - lead by the North - Now you decide you want a different set of laws as well - do you think this is fair?
If we have a constitution that allows everyone to practice their religion freely - then of what use exactly is the Sharia law?
Thank you sir.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment